Abstract
This study focuses on the detailed characterization of modified polyurethane foams, emphasizing their quasi-static compression behaviour and microstructural properties, to evaluate their potential application in shock-absorbing systems. Through systematic synthesis, we produced various formulations of polyurethane foams. We subjected them to comprehensive quasi-static compression tests to understand their deformation and energy absorption characteristics under controlled loading conditions. Concurrently, microstructural analyses were conducted to elucidate the relationship between the cellular architecture of the foams and their mechanical responses. Although the foams were not directly integrated into shock absorbers, the findings lay a foundational understanding of how their structural and compositional variations influence performance metrics crucial for shock absorption applications. This research contributes to the broader knowledge base required for the future design and optimization of polyurethane foam-based shock absorbers, highlighting critical areas for further investigation and development.
References
Gibson LJ, Ashby MF. Cellular solids: structure and properties. Cellular Solids: Structure and Properties, Second Edition 1997; 9: 1-510. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139878326
Warren WE, Kraynik AM. Linear elastic behavior of a low-density Kelvin foam with open cells 1997. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2788983
Zhu HX, Mills NJ, Knott JF. Analysis of the high strain compression of open-cell foams. J Mech Phys Solids 1997; 45: 1875-904. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5096(97)00027-6
Boumdouha N, Safidine Z, Boudiaf A. Preparation of Nonlethal Projectiles by Polyurethane Foam with the Dynamic and Microscopic Characterization for Risk Assessment and Management. ACS Omega 2022. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.2c01736
Ogden RW. Large deformation isotropic elasticity-on the correlation of theory and experiment for incompressible rubberlike solids. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A Mathematical and Physical Sciences 1972; 326: 565-84. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1972.0026
Blatz PJ, Ko WL. Application of finite elastic theory to the deformation of rubbery materials. Transactions of the Society of Rheology 1962; 6: 223-52. https://doi.org/10.1122/1.548937
Yeoh H-H, Truong V-D. Quantitative analysis of linamarin in cassava using a cassava β-glucosidase electrode. Food Chem 1993; 47: 295-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/0308-8146(93)90164-B
Boumdouha N, Safidine Z, Boudiaf A, Duchet-Rumeau J, Gerard J-F. Experimental study of the dynamic behaviour of loaded polyurethane foam free fall investigation and evaluation of microstructure. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-022-08963-1
Brandel B, Lakes RS. Negative Poisson's ratio polyethylene foams. J Mater Sci 2001; 36: 5885-93. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012928726952
Colton JS, Suh NP. Nucleation of microcellular foam: Theory and practice. Polym Eng Sci 1987; 27: 500-3. https://doi.org/10.1002/pen.760270704
Holl MR, Kumar V, Garbini JL, Murray WR. Cell nucleation in solid-state polycarbonate-co2 foams: Evidence of a triaxial tensile failure mechanism. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Materials Division (Publication) MD 1996; 74: 205-6. https://doi.org/10.1115/IMECE1996-1406
Antunes M, Velasco JI. Polymeric foams. vol. 11. ACS Publications 2019. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym11071179
Gibson LJ, Ashby MF. Cellular solids: structure and properties. Cambridge university press 1999.
Boumdouha N, Safidine Z, Boudiaf A. A new study of dynamic mechanical analysis and the microstructure of polyurethanefoams filled. Turk J Chem 2022; 46: 814-34. https://doi.org/10.55730/1300-0527.3371
Kannus P, Parkkari J, Poutala J. Comparison of force attenuation properties of four different hip protectors under simulated falling conditions in the elderly: An in vitro biomechanical study. Bone 1999; 25: 229-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/S8756-3282(99)00154-4
Fleischli JG, Lavery LA, Vela SA, Ashry H, Lavery DC. Comparison of strategies for reducing pressure at the site of neuropathic ulcers. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 1997; 87: 466-72. https://doi.org/10.7547/87507315-87-10-466
Boumdouha N, Safidine Z, Boudiaf A, Oukara A, Tria DE, Louar A. Mechanical and microstructural characterization of polyurethane foams. 8th Chemistry days JCh8-EMP, Bordj El Bahri, Algeria: Military Polytechnic School (EMP); 2019; p. 169. https://doi.org/10.4000/cybergeo.24732
Boumdouha N, Safidine Z, Boudiaf A. Experimental Study of Loaded Foams During Free Fall Investigation and Evaluation of Microstructure. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 2021. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-792400/v1
N. Boumdouha, A. Boudiaf, Z. Safidine. Mechanical and chemical characterizations of filled polyurethane foams used for non-lethal projectiles. 10 the European Symposium on Non-Lethal Weapons EWG-NLW, Brussels, Belgium: Royal Military Academy 2019; p. 68. https://doi.org/10.4000/cybergeo.24738
Boumdouha N, Safidine Z, Boudiaf A, Oukara A, Tria DE, Louar MA. Manufacture of polyurethane foam with a certain density. The International Conference on Recent Advances in Robotics and Automation ICRARE'18, Monastir - Tunisia: CES International Joint Conferences 2018; pp. 21-30. https://doi.org/10.4000/cybergeo.24737
Noureddine B, Zitouni S, Achraf B, Houssém C, Jannick D-R, Jean-François G. Development and Characterization of Tailored Polyurethane Foams for Shock Absorption. Applied Sciences 2022; 12: 2206. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12042206
Boumdouha N, Duchet-Rumeau J, Gerard J-F, Eddine Tria D, Oukara A. Research on the Dynamic Response Properties of Nonlethal Projectiles for Injury Risk Assessment. ACS Omega 2022. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.2c06265
Quintero MW, Escobar JA, Rey A, Sarmiento A, Rambo CR, Oliveira APN de, et al. Flexible polyurethane foams as templates for cellular glass-ceramics. J Mater Process Technol 2009; 209: 5313-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2009.03.021
Sonnenschein M, Wendt BL, Schrock AK, Sonney JM, Ryan AJ. The relationship between polyurethane foam microstructure and foam aging. Polymer (Guildf) 2008; 49: 934-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2008.01.008
Boumdouha N, Louar MA. Influence of Microstructure on the Dynamic Behaviour of Polyurethane Foam with Various Densities. Journal of Basic & Applied Sciences 2023; 19: 131-50. https://doi.org/10.29169/1927-5129.2023.19.12
Zhang J, Zhu Y, Li K, Yuan H, Du J, Qin Q. Dynamic response of sandwich plates with GLARE face-sheets and honeycomb core under metal foam projectile impact: Experimental and numerical investigations. Int J Impact Eng 2022; 164: 104201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2022.104201
Guo H, Yuan H, Zhang J, Ruan D. Review of sandwich structures under impact loadings: experimental, numerical and theoretical analysis. Thin-Walled Structures 2023: 111541. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2023.111541
Trudeau PA. Analysis and optimization of a new method for creating sandwich composites using polyurethane foam 2010.
Specification S. Standard Specification for Flexible Cellular Materials — Poly(Vinyl Chloride) Foam. Annual Book of ASTM Standards 2005; i: 1-6.
Gibson LJ, Ashby MF. Cellular solids: Structure and properties, second edition. Cellular Solids: Structure and Properties, Second Edition 2014; 9: 1-510. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139878326
Harte AM, Fleck NA, Ashby MF. The fatigue strength of sandwich beams with an aluminium alloy foam core. Int J Fatigue 2001; 23: 499-507. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-1123(01)00012-3
Goussery-Vafiadès. Caractérisations Microstructurale Et Mécanique De Mousses De Nickel À Cellules Ouvertes Pour Batteries De Véhicules Hybrides 2004.
Bezazi A, Scarpa F. Mechanical behaviour of conventional and negative Poisson's ratio thermoplastic polyurethane foams under compressive cyclic loading. Int J Fatigue 2007; 29: 922-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2006.07.015
Goods SH, Neuschwanger CL, Whinnery LL, Nix WD. Mechanical properties of a particle-strengthened polyurethane foam. J Appl Polym Sci 1999; 74: 2724-36. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19991209)74:11<2724::AID-APP20>3.0.CO;2-1
Saint-Michel F, Chazeau L, Cavaillé J-Y. Mechanical properties of high density polyurethane foams: II Effect of the filler size. Compos Sci Technol 2006; 66: 2709-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2006.03.008
Saha MC, Mahfuz H, Chakravarty UK, Uddin M, Kabir ME, Jeelani S. Effect of density, microstructure, and strain rate on compression behavior of polymeric foams. Materials Science and Engineering A 2005; 406: 328-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2005.07.006
Jin H, Lu WY, Scheffel S, Hinnerichs TD, Neilsen MK. Full-field characterization of mechanical behavior of polyurethane foams. Int J Solids Struct 2007; 44: 6930-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2007.03.018
van der Schuur M, van der Heide E, Feijen J, Gaymans RJ. Elastic behavior of flexible polyether (urethane-urea) foam materials. Polymer (Guildf) 2004; 45: 2721-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2004.02.016
Moreland JC, Wilkes GL, Turner RB. Viscoelastic behavior of flexible slabstock polyurethane foams: Dependence on temperature and relative humidity. I. Tensile and compression stress (load) relaxation. J Appl Polym Sci 1994; 52: 549-68. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.1994.070520411
Viot P, Plougonven E, Bernard D. Microtomography on polypropylene foam under dynamic loading: 3D analysis of bead morphology evolution. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 2008; 39: 1266-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2007.11.014
Viot P, Beani F. Comportement de mousses polymères en compression dynamique. Revue Des Composites et Des Matériaux Avancés 2003; 13: 283-92. https://doi.org/10.3166/rcma.13.283-292
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.